Subject: Going Up in Smoke
Dear Editor,
Legalizing weed might be a useful debate, but I think it’s hilarious that you see it as an “innovative idea” to help provide struggling states generate more revenue. Seems more like a “knee-jerk” reaction; perhaps it would be more “innovative” to look at what our government should provide and make cuts that compliment the lower revenues. OR, maybe it would be more “innovative” to look at which states are in the worst shape and figure out the reasoning behind it... and make changes for the better. ‘Nahhh... let’s just legalize weed and tax it.’
I think it is worth mentioning, 3 of the 5 states with the largest budget deficits (FY 2010) already allow medicinal marijuana. If legislation passes in New York, ‘Stoner States’ will have 4 of the 5 worst budget deficits.
My question is: If weed is the answer, then why are states that have legalized medicinal marijuana (over 10 years ago) in such bad financial shape? You don’t need to have bad cataracts to get medicinal marijuana in California; most people with a prescription don’t even have a runny nose.
Again, I think there are some pretty good reasons to consider it. However, the evidence you use to support your stance smells a little ‘skunky’ to me; maybe you took too big of a ‘rip’ before collecting your thoughts for that piece.
Matt Wallach
Be the first to comment on this article!