College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

A woman fighting for a change

A Day in the Life of Gyla Myers

Published: Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Gyla Myers

Nashara Robinson

Myers hugs her children, Lola, 3, and Lauren, 4, outside the Child Care Center. The girls spend their days in the Child Care Center every day while Myers attends class. Ever since the Board of Trustees voted to close the facility on July 1, Myers has become an advocate for keeping it open.

 

In November, the STLCC Board of Trustees voted 4-2 to close the Child Care Center facilities at Meramec and Forest Park on July 1, 2010. Two hundred and ten students currently have children in child care, and one woman is not ready to give up on the chances for a turnaround. That woman is Gyla Myers.

Myers, 35, is an STLCC-Meramec student who currently has two children attending the Child Care Center. Her children, Lauren, 4, and Lola, 3, spend their days in Meramec’s child care every day while Myers attends class. Since the decision was made to close the Child Care Center as part of an effort to cut one million dollars from STLCC’s budget by July 1, Myers has become an active advocate, along with other women, to try and convince the Board of Trustees to re-open the center.

She said that she and the some other mothers keep in contact on a regular basis to organize information to present to the board.

"We talk about strategy and what we can do. We have brought a lot of facts to the table in regard to the decision to close Meramec and Forest Park," Myers said. "I think it’s a wonderful thing to have these 209 women as a support system, as women should support women. It’s so unfortunate that there was one male and five women on the board and three of those women voted against [keeping the Child Care Center open]."

She said that the Board’s vote to close the Child Care Center has been anything but easy and has even affected her studies. Myers said she recently dropped a course due to the strain from the decision and the grief she is experiencing from the loss of her mother.

"It’s been devastating. It has affected me emotionally. I struggle academically with the strain. I think, most importantly, what has affected me the most is the 209 women that I witness. Their stories are much worse off than mine could be. I am fortunate in a way," she said.

Myers, who grew up in southern Illinois, started at Meramec in January 2009 in the court reporting program but is now a political science major.

"My husband and I decided when the economy started to head for the worse that one of us should go to school to get further training. Even though my husband has a good job and has a degree, we opted that I would go forth," Myers said. "I stumbled across a political science class. Between taking those classes and becoming involved with the child care back in June 2009, I knew then there was something else down the road for Gyla Myers."

Myers said she is on the Dean’s list, is an honor scholar and a member of Phi Theta Kappa. She said she doesn’t have much spare time between taking 11 credits this semester, being a mother and a wife and even studying in the library for hours each week in the evenings. On top of all that, she said she spends hours each day researching the minutes of past Board of Trustee meetings from recently to years back.

"The board agendas and the board minutes are posted online. I even went back to 2005, and if I can’t find the information there, I make a formal Sunshine request under the Missouri State Law," Myers said. Myers said she is a strong believer in the possibility for the Child Care Center reopening because the caliber of care is so high.

"There’s nothing not to like to be quite honest. I like the convenience and seeing my children thrive in this environment because mommy’s at school and so are the girls. Not only am I bettering myself and gaining knowledge, my girls are gaining knowledge. I hear a lot of people state that it is economic, that’s a price point," Myers said. "For me, it’s not. I would pay more to send my children here because it is quality care."

Myers said she attributes her children’s development to the Child Care Center.

"I have watched my girls, especially Lauren, go from ‘I’m not going to use the potty,’ to wearing big girl undies and going to the potty. Her vocabulary has expanded by thousands of words, so I’ve seen remarkable change and a confidence," she said.

Regardless of Lauren’s and Lola’s progress, as of now, the Child Care Center is still scheduled to close in July. In order for Myer’s to continue her education, she said she might have to move back to Illinois so her father can assist with child care.

"Not only myself, but the 209 women will have to figure out what we are going to do as a solution to keep going to school. I think for the most part, at least the majority that I have talked to, can’t or won’t be going to school," Myers said. "That’s what’s sad. As an active member of PTK, honor society and being on the Dean’s list, I am receiving letters in the mail now in regard to transfer options, and if I have to stop going to school, everything that I have worked for is lost."

As for now, Myers said she is going to continue to hug and kiss her daughters every day as she drops them off before class.

"I have my eyes set on the prize. I have my goals set forth, and I think that’s another reason why I continue to go forth with the Child Care Center," Myers said. "I refuse to be silenced. I am going to continue to express my First Amendment rights."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

27 comments

Anonymous
Wed May 19 2010 17:00
and more interesting is that the larger firms are offering childcare, as most corporatons are moving towards the same idea. This appears to be "Cutting Edge" according to competent financiers, but what does Fortune or the Wall Street Journal know right?????
Fact Checker
Wed May 19 2010 16:52
ahh yes indeed Poly Sci is a strong foundation for Law School and it brings me greater joy to inform you, yet again, that you're wrong about something else......that being, Child Care & Law School......University of Missouri, School of Law offers childcare.....you should really check out the facts before you present a case....really an error of judgement on your part......next.......
Anonymous
Thu Mar 25 2010 21:18
ah yes. political science is the foundation for a juris doctorate. I hear law schools have wonderful child care centers.
Anonymous
Sat Mar 20 2010 20:46
The college is facing financial difficulties but there are a number of areas that could be considered for cuts (Wildwood should be a satellite campus, not a full campus; reduce the # of administrators; implement a hiring freeze; how about the VP of Workforce Dev who makes $150k per year? The Technology VP? All the $$$ spent on Centers for Teaching and Learning (and staff) that faculty do not even care about or use? And how many assistants does the current Chancellor have (vs the previous Chancellor?) We could also reduce and/or consolidate CTE programs with low enrollments. Absolutely do not buy a new building for FV when we are facing a $6.5 million short fall in 2012). All that said - when we cut health care services and child care centers we lose sight of our mission as a community college. We serve our students and our community - not the Chancellor and Board.
Univ. of Illinois Alumni
Wed Mar 17 2010 13:35
I'm proud of Gyla and I believe that one with the courage, and the will to fight for a cause is in "demand." I also want to mention, as a former member of The Rotary in Urbana, Illinois that I find this decision to be disastrous and must question the leadership that STLCC is under. As for Ms. Myers major, there's always jobs for those who distribute leadership skills and determination and I admire that she set the "bar" a little higher for herself. Lastly, I'd like to note that a "Political Science" degree is the foundation for a Juris Doctorate and it "appears" that she's better suited expressing her voice rather than taking down ones voice. Keep up the good work Gyla, we support you!
This is ridiculous
Wed Mar 17 2010 02:53
OK, i am the original "attack" poster. This was in no way meant as an attack. If it was an attack i would have said something like "way to go, good job going from a major that has actual potential (court reporting, which is a skill that is in demand and has a decent starting salary) to something like political science (a major that is regularly listed in the US News and World Report List of most useless majors). That would be an attack. Brown V. Board of education was a lawsuit. The women's suffrage did not simply rely on talking to congress for 2 minutes every month. The fight for workers rights did not consist of people talking about how workers need rights and underage workers should not be employed and everyone deserves a fair wage. The civil rights law was not passed because MLK simply went to congress and requested it. I too don't remember MLK's famous "i have a dream" speech being given in a congressional hearing room in the basement of an office building on NW New Jersey. the definition of "insanity" as i wrote is doing the same thing over and over and expecting the same result. Might i suggest that you rally a significant number of students (more than the less that 1% that is served) to protest the closing of the childcare center. Then you might have a chance at changing the board's opinion. Catty arguments about public releases of board minutes get you nowhere. I am truly sorry about the misunderstanding.
CHANGE
Tue Mar 16 2010 22:56
What happened to the topic of the article, how is it we've lost concept of the idea that a woman is fighting for change? Sure, we can compare statistics all day long, but at the end of the day what have we accomplished? As for the post and "insane" I suppose Brown v Board was insane right? I suppose the idea of sweat shops was insane right? I suppose women voting is insane too? And lastly, MLK and his continued fight for change was insane too? If you want a change, you have to voice your opinion and not give up, no one said it would be easy, and some of these posts are discouraging, but I hope she continues to ask for a change. Here's an idea, how about a change in leadership at Meramec, how about a change in the Board and how about this change, LOOK AT THE FACTS AND THEN PROCEED WITH A DECISION. If this is about STLCC needing to cut expenses, then CLOSE FLO VALLEY CHILDCARE. I'll sure be glad when April 6th comes around, I know who I won't vote for as we need a change!!!!
An Observer
Tue Mar 16 2010 21:42
Regarding a previous post, and the movement toward online classes. This is not a movement that is restricted to our campus; it is a growing trend on most campuses whose purpose is to accommodate more students - particularly in a land-locked campus like ours (with no real space for additional buildings or expansion). More students (in numbers that exceed the number of "real seats" in a traditional classroom) can take more courses without the restrictions of time and place. This may even be a solution for those with child care issues...who may be able to take many courses in the comfort of their homes, at times when the children do not require their direct attention (such as when the kiddos are asleep).
Anonymous
Tue Mar 16 2010 20:46
Cost per Credit Hour
STLCC - 83
UMSL – 236
Wash U – 1,438
SLU – 995
Webster – 495
Fontbonne – 489
Missouri Baptist – 525

Savings at Meramec based on 11 credit hours
UMSL – 1,683
Wash U – 14,905
SLU – 10,032
Webster – 4,532
Fontbonne – 4,466
Missouri Baptist – 4,862

How dare they provide such substantial savings for students gaining a quality education. I bet they even make difficult but necessary cuts to non-education related student services that service less than 1% of the student population to maintain this cost structure. Those *expletives*. Next thing you know they will probably offer more online classes as a previous poster stated (although i don't know how that would help being that teachers are paid the same whether they teach an online class or in-person) but hey, let's not let these simple facts get in the way of our misplaced rage.

Fight the Power
Tue Mar 16 2010 18:10
We need more people like Gyla Myers to stand up and fight for what they believe in. This school is doing nothing but cutting back on services. It starts with Child care, then athletics, next it will be the teachers themselves moving to "on-line" classes. You can see a pattern beginning - it's all about profits for this school - not about the students.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 16 2010 17:55
I think Gala Myers is very strong person to stand up for her rights and your also. You never know when school will cut something essential to you. More people should be more like Mrs. Myers
CHILD CARE IS ESSENTIAL
Mon Mar 15 2010 14:34
So let me get this straight - a student decides to attend STLCC because they offer a service like affordable child care - after attending a couple of semesters the service is suddenly voted out by a board of directors - and now this student is being trashed by some of you for asking why??? Is it wrong get an explanation for this drastic change in a school service that has been in place for over 15 years. Why now when enrollment is up? Why now in this economy when more people than ever are trying to go back to school to improve their chances of employment?

This closing will have a major impact on every student and students family that attends Forrest Park and Meramec child care. You are uprooting kids from thier day-care and forcing them to relocate. If relocation to Flo-valley is too inconvenient (in most cases it will be) you are talking about losing students all together. For those of you that don't know - average cost of child care per month is $1000 per child. This makes attending school and paying child care virtually impossible for 95% of all households - unless you have a service like STLCC child care. Take away affordable childcare at STLCC - take away a students dream of bettering their future and their childs future. Here's a crazy idea - instead of shutting it down - why don't you advertise this wonderful vaue added service. What a concept - a "community" college that acutally cares about the community that it is located in.

Student Parent
Mon Mar 15 2010 11:16
actually, in regards to the expansion of FV, it states that "They need money for brick & matter facility" and that's at 2 million, according to the quote. I applaud the young lady and ask why the board is ignoring the facts? I watched the video and pulled up the material for myself, and everything she said is true!!! Wow, this is our Board, they don't listen and they ignore the facts. And who's the one that put together these lies??? Again, someone needs to ask for some change, some change of leadership and a change of board, we need CHANGE!!!! I'm a parent and I've had the luxury to meet Gyla, and she's truly fighting for a change as she has a huge heart. Why is it that no one listens and they ignore the facts? I'll be there to support Gyla on the 25th, and every meeting there after, that's the least we, as parents can do, we will not stop supporting her or the cause, we need this service offered.
Mom of Four
Sun Mar 14 2010 13:28
I've been reading the comments and taking notes accordingly, I also watched the video. I think this is more about a woman who questions the decision made by the board to close the 2 centers that serve the students. I happen to know, for a fact, that Flo Valley serves the least amount of students as it's a "Community Center" as I have a friend who used the center. As for the convenience factor, I think this is more about a grant the parents receive to offset their tuition as this was to be equally distributed among the 3 centers. It's also my understanding that FV told students from Meramec and F-Park that they weren't eligible for student rates and upon enrollement they would have to enroll as a "community member" therefore; not receiving the same rate as the few students who use Flo nor would they be eligible to participate in the grant. Lastly, I called the centers, and these women pay for childcare, they don't use them free of charge. I find this to be in extreme poor taste to question or judge a young lady who is asking for a change, it's hard enough to be a parent and the article states that she has 2 small children and recently lost her mother and now she's under scrutiny, attacked, referred to as insane, and the sad thing is that most of these comments probably did come from women. Now, how about agreeing on that? I think she's doing a great thing because alot of women can't or won't go forward and they need someone like her.
Cant we all just get along
Sat Mar 13 2010 22:59
Let's all be honest. The health care services probably weren't used by as many students as the childcare center. The student center, with those new TVs (which probably cost $4k tops) and the cafeteria services, and the new (planned) expansion of FV (which this very paper says would largely be paid for with a government grant) will certainly serve more students than the 210 that utilize childcare centers. Can we all agree on this?

That said, why don't these young women go to FV and utilize the childcare center there and continue their education with STLCC? If they don't have their own transportation, public transportation can get them there. Would it be as convenient? Probably not. Is that an excuse for not taking this option? No. If inconvenience is used as an excuse, then you just want things to be easier for you at other students' expense. Is that right? As far as non-traditional students go, they are the ones who need STLCC the most right now. "Traditional" students are just as unemployed as ever. Non-traditional students need to get retrained or educated to take on a new field and get this economy going again. Oh and as for a competent financier seeing this coming, are you serious? You want the hack that STLCC employs to do finances downtown to be better than the people who run the economy? People who invest millions upon millions every day? The most brilliant financial minds in the world? Come on now.

Soccer Mom
Sat Mar 13 2010 20:35
This is amazing to witness, have we forgot the message? This is about a young lady who values a service that STLCC provides and yet the service is provided at FV. One can't claim "budget" and then transfer 11 + Million from reserves. This was handled wrong and they continue to spend and expand to reach out to the "non-traditional" students and yet the college eliminated services at FP & Meramec, which serves the most students. I would think in regards to "Forecasting" that a competent financier would have seen this before expanding to Wildwood and the Harrison Center and now the expansion to FV. Again, I understand "cuts" but be equal with regard to services and it's my understanding having worked in the health care industry that this is the most expensive service and no one spoke out against this when the decision was made, unlike child care. I can tell you that my children, who attend school, are insured from their father and I, I don't see this as an imperative service on campus. Although it is a wonderful service, and it is needed, I highly doubt that it is utilized by 200 students every day.
An Observer
Sat Mar 13 2010 19:22
I've been following the comment lines, and I don't think this began or continues as an attack against a young woman seeking an education. Rather, some bloggers are trying to point out that current and forecasted economic problems in the district (reduction in state funding) require sometimes painful solutions...although we would like the college to be all things to all students, and to provide all things to all students, it is fiscally responsible to review programs and services, and to continue to support those that reach the most students. Some of the programs and services that are eliminated or restructured have been done so with this in mind. If I were to highlight a program that has been eliminated to the detriment of most students on our campuses, I would choose health care services. All students benefit from the availability of health care services on our campus, and the loss of these services could have catastrophic consequences. If we want to rally to "bring back" a service, I would choose one that services and meets the needs of most, rather than one such as child care, which serves a relatively small number of students. I have to manage my own small household budget, and I can't have or buy everything I want or need. Hard choices must be made...at the individual, family, and institutional levels.
GYLA MYERS
Sat Mar 13 2010 18:55
Hello, this is GYLA MYERS and I would like to say in regards to the comments, particularly the pessimistic comments that "I have strong shoulders, I can take it" and "I find the attempted dismal attacks to be both enpowering and encouraging towards my efforts, I thrive upon attack" this is about principle, not getting my way, see you at Cosand the 25th!
Another Taxpayer
Sat Mar 13 2010 17:18
I don't see it so much as bashing a young woman trying to get an education. In fact, she in the article states that she may have to move back to illinois to what - GET AN EDUCATION - so she'll be getting a quality community college education regardless of the outcome of her efforts. I see this more as a standing up for the other 27000+ students who don't need childcare centers or big public relations departments or redundant athletic teams taking valuable dollars away from their educational opportunities.
Anonymous
Sat Mar 13 2010 17:13
Increased enrollment does indeed mean more fees being paid. Now, with a budget of $195 plus million, that works out to over $7000 per student per year. If a student takes 15 hours in each of the fall spring AND summer semesters, they will pay just over $3700 in tuition. There is no new tax money coming in and no new funding from the state, in addition to the agreement not to raise tuition in exchange for keeping state funding at its current level. Would you, taxpayer, care to explain how the college is better off financially with the 13% increase in enrollment at a loss of about $3300 per student? And that loss is based on a student taking 45 hours per calendar year, which i think we can both agree doesn't happen all that much.






log out